Turning Community Assets Into Leverage

How land, institutions, culture, relationships, and local spending can become negotiating power.

Last month, I wrote about Woodlawn having the pieces and the real work being making them move as one system. This month, I want to test something harder: whether those pieces can actually hold weight in a negotiation, or whether they’re still sitting dormant.

Because having assets and having leverage are not the same thing.

A community can hold land, institutions, culture, relationships, and spending power for years without any of it functioning as leverage. It just sits there. Present, but inactive. And developers, cities, and investors read that difference immediately. They know what a community owns. What they’re really assessing is whether that community knows how to use it.

An asset becomes leverage when it starts changing the other side’s options. If they can ignore it, work around it, or make the deal without it, it isn’t leverage yet.

Every time a neighborhood falls short, the response is the same. More investment. More programs. More resources. More outside attention. Ask for enough of the right things and eventually somebody hands you a check.

But that’s the wrong question. The more interesting one is whether a community has learned how to make what it already possesses matter. Because for most Black neighborhoods on the South Side, the shortage was never the asset. It was the leverage.

Leverage Is Not Ownership. It’s Consequence.

Owning something does not automatically create negotiating power. Land is not leverage simply because you own it. Institutional authority is not leverage simply because an organization has existed for decades. Culture is not leverage because people celebrate it. Relationships are not leverage because people know each other. Spending power is not leverage simply because the number is large.

Leverage exists when an asset changes somebody else’s calculation. It should affect things like:

• Access
• Capital
• Location
• Demand
• Entitlement
• Participation
• Execution
• Market opportunity
• Return

The difference between an asset and leverage is whether the other side has to negotiate with it, or can simply route around it. If they can route around it, you have an asset. If they have to account for it, you have leverage.

Want to read the full article?

This post is exclusive to J.Byron’s Reflection community. Drop your email above to subscribe instantly, or use the link below to jump straight to the content.